Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
[External Link Removed for Guests]
thanks
Board: Open.
BAN: Max 5 Scene Requests per time per 24 HOURS! | Mark your topics [FiLLED] after | No Non-Scene Audio Requests
Harassment of any kind not tolerated on the forum. Instant ban.
BAN: Max 5 Scene Requests per time per 24 HOURS! | Mark your topics [FiLLED] after | No Non-Scene Audio Requests
Harassment of any kind not tolerated on the forum. Instant ban.
[FiLLED]-Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
- DreamWorld
- 100 Posts
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2022 7:01 pm
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
the one marked in red does not belong in a correct scene sfv file:
then good luck finding the unmodified sfv filebahtiglupaka wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2023 7:15 pmI understand that it gives me a bad crc and if it were me I would not accept such a file!
- bahtiglupaka
- VIP
- Posts: 4350
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2023 6:29 pm
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 5614 times
Re: Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
I know this but I always preferred and prefer an sfv file to be from srrdb! I'm closing the dispute on my end!
-
- 100 Posts
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2022 11:11 pm
- Location: Italy
- Has thanked: 493 times
- Been thanked: 302 times
Re: Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
srrDB data are not always correct.
For example:
[External Link Removed for Guests]
Two sets. We could guess that one maybe genuine.
For example:
[External Link Removed for Guests]
Two sets. We could guess that one maybe genuine.
- Swisha99
- 500 Posts
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2022 7:34 pm
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 2115 times
Re: Pet_Shop_Boys_-_Absolutely_Fabulous_-_(CDS)_-_(1994)_-_ATM99
[External Link Removed for Guests]
[External Link Removed for Guests]
Heres two that are the same release, diff sfv. Only diff in files is a space in the ID3 tag. Either SRR works on the releases. Since they had diff suffix they didnt get merged into the same release with one being listed as confirmed. You can find quite a few EOS rls like this.
I had another today that the unconfirmed sfv was the correct one. The release as in SRRDB has ID3V1,V2, and APE tags, as well as no group comment. Mine had ID3v1 only, with group comment. The confirmed bad SFV also had a date comment 7 years after the release was ripped. The unconfirmed file was the correct one.
They really need a way to mark entries as questionable or report them.
[External Link Removed for Guests]
Heres two that are the same release, diff sfv. Only diff in files is a space in the ID3 tag. Either SRR works on the releases. Since they had diff suffix they didnt get merged into the same release with one being listed as confirmed. You can find quite a few EOS rls like this.
I had another today that the unconfirmed sfv was the correct one. The release as in SRRDB has ID3V1,V2, and APE tags, as well as no group comment. Mine had ID3v1 only, with group comment. The confirmed bad SFV also had a date comment 7 years after the release was ripped. The unconfirmed file was the correct one.
They really need a way to mark entries as questionable or report them.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 99 guests