Euphoric Vocals

Condor wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 10, 2022 12:17 am

PH = pHrOzEn-HeLL = 0DAY grp

They have over 5.500 releases and are active for 20+ years.

Hunter wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 06, 2022 6:31 am

It will not be added, cause (...) it can easily be confused with pH scene group.

RTXXXX asked referring to this one: [External Link Removed for Guests]

PandaBear wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:30 pm

Peepol-Fun_Fun_Fun-Vinyl-2001-BWA_INT

-BWA_INT = Non-scene

hunter plz can you comment on this and add to the list ....

T87.Rave wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:37 pm

PandaBear wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 13, 2022 1:30 pm

Peepol-Fun_Fun_Fun-Vinyl-2001-BWA_INT

-BWA_INT = Non-scene

hunter plz can you comment on this and add to the list ....

We've already discussed about BWA_INT HERE and I still think that adding them to the list will only be confusing, cause there are a lot of legit scene rels from them, so it's hard to ban the whole group... In this one case, my suggestion would be to just be careful and check that a specific rls is indexed in predbs before adding a REQ. What do you think about it?

if you are sure about that, they are releasing a lot of legit scene, so it doesn't matter, it should be going forward,

but again it's important better to follow > "just be careful and check that a specific rls is indexed in predbs before adding a REQ".

T87.Rave wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:25 pm

if you are sure about that, they are releasing a lot of legit scene, so it doesn't matter, it should be going forward,

but again it's important better to follow > "just be careful and check that a specific rls is indexed in predbs before adding a REQ".

The whole BWA together with BWA_INT according to predbs has about 6,000 correctly pred rels. Nevertheless, I have added a note about this group at the end of the list so that everyone remembers that fakes may occur in this case.

Only a handful (~30) of pred BWA_INT releases are legit. About 60 are !addpre spam. Public predb's only add to confusion by mixing in releases from other sources (like srrdb). Allowing them with an asterisk is probably best solution. However, outright banning them would mean minimal loss.

PandaBear wrote: ↑

Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:03 pm

Only a handful (~30) of pred BWA_INT releases are legit. About 60 are !addpre spam. Public predb's only add to confusion by mixing in releases from other sources (like srrdb). Allowing them with an asterisk is probably best solution. However, outright banning them would mean minimal loss.

I guess everyone here knows (or at least should know) that srrdb isn't a predb of any kind. But of course you're generally right, so I made it clear to check not only if they are, but also if predate coincides with date in nfo. Then we can rather assume that this is a legit scene.

For example:

[External Link Removed for Guests] - predate in public predbs: 10.11.2019, date in nfo: Sep-03-2006 - it rather raises doubts

Hello @ all,

I have a question again. Is Italobrothers_-_Counting_Down_The_Days-WEB-2007-CENSORED scene or non scene, because in this list is it uncatogariced.

Thanks for your help.

RTXXXX wrote: ↑

Thu Jun 16, 2022 9:24 pm

Hello @ all,

I have a question again. Is Italobrothers_-_Counting_Down_The_Days-WEB-2007-CENSORED scene or non scene, because in this list is it uncatogariced.

Thanks for your help.

It's scene

MES (Missing Electro Sounds) - personal - [External Link Removed for Guests]
DOM (DEO OPTIMO MAXIMO) - [External Link Removed for Guests]